lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.19pre3aa2
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 05:12:59PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Correct. I think the CONFIG option isn't worthwhile in the first place
> and this is why I only left the CONFIG_M686 knowing most smp kernels are
> compiled that way. 4096bytes of virtual vmallc space and some houndred
> bytes of bytecode doesn't worth the config option. If something the
> CONFIG_F00F would be more a documentation effort 8).

nononono! CONFIG_FOOF is a derived symbol from whatever CONFIG_Mx8x
is set. Much in the way we derive CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK, CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE
and freinds..

--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.101 / U:1.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site