lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.19pre2aa1
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 08:30:55AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > {
> > clear_bit(BH_Wait_IO, &bh->b_state);
> > clear_bit(BH_Lock, &bh->b_state);
> > + clear_bit(BH_Launder, &bh->b_state);
> > smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> > if (waitqueue_active(&bh->b_wait))
>
> actually, while refining the patch and integrating it, I audited it some
> more carefully and the above was wrong,

It's complex.

Would there be a way to simplify the thing so the author
of the code can at least get it right and there's a chance
of other people understanding it too ? ;)

Rik
--
<insert bitkeeper endorsement here>

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:21    [W:0.073 / U:22.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site