Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Mar 2002 04:27:24 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] serial.c procfs 2nd try - discussion |
| |
Russell King wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 05:41:09PM -0800, Ed Vance wrote: > >>2. Does anybody know of anything that will break because of the leading >> zeros that are now present on the address field? >> > >I'm not overly happy with this idea - there isn't anything that says an >ioport address has 4 digits. I know of machines where an ioport address >has 8, and I'm sure on the Alpha or Sparc64 its probably 16 digits. > Agreed. Standard portability convention seems to say that one treats io ports and io mem both as unsigned long, including when printing...
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |