[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: IO stats in /proc/partitions
At 21:51 12/03/02, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Followup to: <>
>By author: Jean-Eric Cuendet <>
>In newsgroup:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I use 2.4.19-pre2-ac4.
> > 2 questions:
> > - Either MD Raid ot LVM IO devices are not accounted in /proc/partitions
> > IO data. Is it normal?
> > - Are the new /proc/partitions IO stats integrated in 2.4.19-pre3?
> >
>If we're adding fields to /proc/partitions, I would like to
>*strongly* recommend that /proc/partitions adds the following
> offset and length

I had a patch for this already. I can update it and resend if the powers
that be want it. Just let me know...


> parent device (if applicable)
>The latter could also be used to identify parallelizable devices
>(spindles) for things like fsck.
> -hpa
><> at work, <> in private!
>"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
> <>
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to
>More majordomo info at
>Please read the FAQ at

"I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW:
ICQ: 8561279 / WWW:

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:21    [W:0.044 / U:1.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site