Messages in this thread | | | From | Nikita Danilov <> | Date | Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:16:43 +0300 | Subject | Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing |
| |
Hans Reiser writes: > Steven Cole wrote: > > >On Monday 11 March 2002 09:08 am, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > > > > > >Perhaps others whose VMS experience is more recent than mine can answer this question. > >More generally, if the infrastructure for keeping file versions around is going > >to be generated for other reasons, having the option to have file versions could > >be useful for some people. I certainly remember people who loved that feature, > >but I wasn't one of them. > > > >Steven > > > > > > I don't use CVS for most papers, proposals, etc,, that I write. If the > version control was turned on with something like a chattr, I would use > it, and emacs could get rid of that damned ~ file that clutters my ls
ls -B
> commands of what should be a listing of only my current version of my > home directory without old versions of files being listed (the disk > space I don't care about, it is the clutter that annoys.) > > Hans >
Nikita.
> - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |