lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 06:51:16PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:15:38AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >
> >>>The problem is that it doesn't play well with other things.
> >>>
> >>Your statement is information free so far, but could be the intro to an
> >>informative statement....;-)
> >>
> >
> >e.g. link, copy, remove.
> >
> In what respect do these not play well?
>
> >
> >
> >
> >Look at the Plan9 backup plan. That was much better thought out.
> >
> Also not enough said to be informative., but could be an introduction to
> an informative statement.

If you can't spend 10 seconds looking it up on Google, you must not
be interested.

>
>

--
---------------------------------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken
Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.
www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.081 / U:0.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site