Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:08:45 -0700 | From | yodaiken@fsmlabs ... | Subject | Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing |
| |
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 06:51:16PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote: > yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote: > > >On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:15:38AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > >>>The problem is that it doesn't play well with other things. > >>> > >>Your statement is information free so far, but could be the intro to an > >>informative statement....;-) > >> > > > >e.g. link, copy, remove. > > > In what respect do these not play well? > > > > > > > > >Look at the Plan9 backup plan. That was much better thought out. > > > Also not enough said to be informative., but could be an introduction to > an informative statement.
If you can't spend 10 seconds looking it up on Google, you must not be interested.
> >
-- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |