Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] RPM build target fixes | From | Alexander Hoogerhuis <> | Date | 10 Mar 2002 18:17:50 +0100 |
| |
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> > > Thats exactly the opposite of what is expected > > > > How so? Given that it actually cleans up after itself you are not left > > with multiple .spec files in any directory? Or have I missed something? > > Most source rpm packages come with a [packagename.spec] file without a > version. >
OK, so the .spec in the tarball should be without (for rpm -ta), and the one left in %_topdir/SPECS should carry it?
Basically why I made the .spec files carry the version was that I have several trees (linux-2.4-[ac|plain|clean|mystuff] and linux-2.5-[dj|plain|clean]) and that way I can build the trees without interfering with eachoter, as all the .spec files, tarballs, RPMs and SRPMs will actually be named something like kernel-$version-$extraversion. That way, if you build two trees they wont stamp on eachother.
ttfn, A -- Alexander Hoogerhuis | alexh@ihatent.com CCNP - CCDP - MCNE - CCSE | +47 908 21 485 "You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it." --Scott McNealy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |