lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: want opinions on possible glitch in 2.4 network error reporti ng
On a sunny Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:08:24 -0500 (EST) Richard B. Johnson gathered
a sheaf of electrons and etched in their motions the following immortal
words:

> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Perches, Joe wrote:
> [SNIPPED..]
> > > That is correct UDP behaviour
> >
> > Do you think this is the correct PacketSocket/RAW behaviour?
>
> Yes.
>
> > How does one guarantee a send/sendto/write?
> > -
>
> Easy, you use send() or write(). These work on stream protocol TCP/IP

I know its an extreme case, but consider that something goes wrong and the
kernel ends up thinking its buffer is always full / zero lenngth /
something horrible.

I'd personally like it if it warned me it wasnt even trying to send my
packets, rather than just ignoring them completely...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.066 / U:1.280 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site