[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Read-Copy Update 2.5.4-pre2
On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 18:51, Mark Hahn wrote:

> yes, but have you evaluated whether it's noticably better than
> other forms of locking? for instance, couldn't your dcache example
> simply use BR locks?

Good point.

One of the things with implicit locking schemes like RCU is that the
performance hit merely shifts. Reading the data may no longer have any
overhead, but the hit is taken elsewhere. One most be careful in
benchmarking RCU locking.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.039 / U:1.988 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site