lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: KSTK_EIP and KSTK_ESP
Date
My fault, I was using lxr.linux.no. I was also confused by
the way it is defined in include/asm-parisc (2.4.17)

#define KSTK_EIP(tsk) (0xdeadbeef)
#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (0xdeadbeef)

Thanks for pointing this out,
Balbir



>From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
>To: balbir_soni@hotmail.com
>CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tigran@veritas.com
>Subject: Re: KSTK_EIP and KSTK_ESP
>Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 12:55:22 -0800 (PST)
>
> From: "Balbir Singh" <balbir_soni@hotmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 12:36:59 -0800
>
> Do we really need these defines, I found that it
> is not used anywhere and defined as deadbeef on
> some architectures. Does it make sense to remove
> these variables from the kernel source?
>
>Perhaps your copy of grep is buggy, check out
>fs/proc/array.c which does make use of those macros.
>




_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.040 / U:1.848 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site