[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] larger kernel stack (8k->16k) per task
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:29:16PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> I think it is entirely inefficient to call an external procedure
> for temporary variable space when the actual math is done by the
> compiler at compile time, and the code is a simple subtraction, then
> later-on a simple addition to a single register!

Depends. If you need a few bytes (and upto 1Kb I'd call a few bytes if
you're careful), then stack usage is fine. If you need more, well, kmalloc
is some 100 cycles...

> If the kernel does not provide sufficient stack-space for small
> buffers and structures, it is a kernel problem,

notice the *small*

The alternative is to double the amount of PER PROCESS overhead in terms of
unswappable memory... Even 1 disk IO will hurt more than your kmalloc of 4Kb
of "small buffers and structures" will in a year.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.070 / U:5.376 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site