Messages in this thread |  | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC] New locking primitive for 2.5 | | Date | Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:57:35 +0100 |
| |
On February 7, 2002 09:36 pm, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote: > > P.S. If this is going to turn into another priority-inheritance flame, I > > am stopping here. Let's take it off-list or just drop it, please. I'd > > much prefer to discuss the current combilock issue which is at hand. ;) > > It's the same issue.
Not necessarily, look at Ingo's observation about replacing semaphores with combi-locks as opposed to replacing spinlocks with combi-locks.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |