lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] New locking primitive for 2.5
Date
On February 7, 2002 09:36 pm, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
> > P.S. If this is going to turn into another priority-inheritance flame, I
> > am stopping here. Let's take it off-list or just drop it, please. I'd
> > much prefer to discuss the current combilock issue which is at hand. ;)
>
> It's the same issue.

Not necessarily, look at Ingo's observation about replacing semaphores with
combi-locks as opposed to replacing spinlocks with combi-locks.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.085 / U:8.228 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site