[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: want opinions on possible glitch in 2.4 network error reporting
> > That is correct UDP behaviour
> This is totally untrue, unless the socket doing non-blocking I/O -- and
> even then you get -1 and EAGAIN from sendto.

Not the case.

> there is no way to "lose" that data before it hits the wire, unless of
> course the network driver is broken and doesn't plug the upper layers when
> its TX queue is full.

UDP is not flow controlled.

> Think of it: if what you said were true, NFS over UDP would be totally
> useless. But it's not, so if UDP data gets lost before it hits the wire,
> it's usually a bug in the network driver.

NFS does UDP flow control of its own. If it didnt it would indeed be
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.083 / U:3.792 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site