lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Ingo's smptimers patch experiment
In article <20020206211925.A8720@in.ibm.com> you wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I ported your smptimers patch to 2.5.3 and experimented with
> it a little bit. Basically I am curious about why we
> we need to call run_all_timers() (which runs timers for all
> CPUs) through the timer bh if locking fails in run_local_timers().

Some driver do ugly things with TIMER_BH, and Ingo's 2.4 patched
tried to stayed source compatible with 2.4 drivers.

For 2.5 I'd really like to see TIMER_BH (all BH's in fact) to gone.

Christoph

--
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.043 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site