Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing | From | Florian Weimer <> | Date | Wed, 06 Feb 2002 16:17:29 +0100 |
| |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:
> The long-range plan, and the real payoff, comes if main developers start > using bk too, which should make syncing a lot easier. That will take some > time, I suspect.
Do you think that at some point, using BitKeeper will become mandatory for subsystem maintainers? ("mandatory" in the sense that non-BitKeeper input is dealt with in a less timely fashion, for example.)
-- Florian Weimer Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE University of Stuttgart http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/ RUS-CERT +49-711-685-5973/fax +49-711-685-5898 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |