Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:00:23 -0500 (EST) | From | "Drew P. Vogel" <> | Subject | Re: windows is more secure than linux!! |
| |
One thing I haven't seen argued is what I find most important. The time frame in which I am vulnerable. I'd rather have 10x the number of vulnerabilities which last 1/10th the time.
--Drew Vogel
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, william fitzgerald wrote: > >> some of you might find this interesting others >> disheartening > >Still others, like me, find it very encouraging >that Microsoft can't stop talking about Linux. >They must be enthusiastic about it, or something. > >> www.shortnews.com/shownews.cfm?id=16886&u_id=623 > >Now add the security holes in ISS, Outlook, Exchange, >Access and all available pieces of Windows software >into the picture so Linux and Windows are measured on >an equal ground. > >Lies, damn lies & statistics. > >regards, > >Rik >-- >DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ > >http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |