[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: windows is more secure than linux!!
One thing I haven't seen argued is what I find most important. The time
frame in which I am vulnerable. I'd rather have 10x the number of
vulnerabilities which last 1/10th the time.

--Drew Vogel

On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:

>On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, william fitzgerald wrote:
>> some of you might find this interesting others
>> disheartening
>Still others, like me, find it very encouraging
>that Microsoft can't stop talking about Linux.
>They must be enthusiastic about it, or something.
>Now add the security holes in ISS, Outlook, Exchange,
>Access and all available pieces of Windows software
>into the picture so Linux and Windows are measured on
>an equal ground.
>Lies, damn lies & statistics.
>DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares?
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to
>More majordomo info at
>Please read the FAQ at

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.082 / U:6.384 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site