[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations

On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Jussi Laako wrote:

> Ok, now I made comparison test with exactly same kernel except other
> one with -K2 patch. O1-K2 behaves significantly worse than old
> scheduler. I think this behaviour was introduced somewhere around
> beginning of -J series. I can't make kernel with old scheduler loose
> datablocks, but with O1 it looses large percentage of the blocks.

what does 'loose datablocks' mean? What application loses datablocks?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:23    [W:0.053 / U:4.192 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site