Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 03 Feb 2002 01:53:13 -0500 | | From | Stevie O <> | | Subject | Re: apm.c and multiple battery slots |
| |
At 09:58 PM 2/2/2002 -0500, Thomas Hood wrote: >Stevie O <stevie@qrpff.net> wrote: > > I suggest we change the first line to reflect an > > overall battery status (i.e. average of all slots > > in system). > >Sounds like a good idea. > > > Then we could add one line for each battery slot, > > indicating <battery status> <battery flag> <battery left % > > > <remaining time in seconds> > >How about putting each of these lines in a separate proc >file? This would avoid changing the format of /proc/apm, >which would break things.
Or we could do something similar to what the IDE subsystem does, and have
/proc/apmbat/0 <- battery [slot] 0 /proc/apmbat/1 <- battery [slot] 1 ... /proc/apmbat/ <- battery [slot] N
I'd actually prefer to call it /proc/apm/ but obviously that won't work :)
-- Stevie-O
Real programmers use COPY CON PROGRAM.EXE
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |