lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: recalc_sigpending() / recalc_sigpending_tsk() ?
Date

torvalds@transmeta.com said:
> Not a chance in hell. The backwards compatibility looks like a
> trivial one-liner:

> compat-2.4.h:
> #define recalc_sigpending() recalc_sigpending(current)

> so what are you complaining about?

Fine. I was trying to define a back-compat version of recalc_sigpending_tsk()
too, before going through all the code and changing recalc_sigpending(current)
to recalc_sigpending and recalc_sigpending(other) to recalc_sigpending_tsk()
- but as you rightly point out there's no justification for using the latter
in any of the driver or fs code that I'm trying to support - and hence it
isn't present, and doesn't need the compat support.


--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:20    [W:0.107 / U:0.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site