[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Lightweight userspace semaphores...
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:53:11AM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> As stated above, I allocate a kernel object <kulock_t> on demand and
> hash it. This way I don't have to pin any user address. What does everybody
> think about the merit of this approach versus the pinning approach?
> In your case, can the lock be allocated at different
> virtual addresses in the various address spaces.

I think this is a relatively important feature. It may not be
possible to use the same virtual address in different processes.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:21    [W:0.163 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site