Messages in this thread | | | From | "Matthew D. Pitts" <> | Subject | Re: Congrats Marcelo, | Date | Tue, 26 Feb 2002 20:08:23 -0500 |
| |
Rainer,
I may be wrong, but I believe the Debian kernel tree is ENTIRELY volunteer work. If that doesn't constitute a major tree, I don't know what does...
Matthew
----- Original Message ----- From: Rainer Ellinger <rainer@ellinger.de> To: Martin J. Bligh <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:47 PM Subject: Re: Congrats Marcelo,
> Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > the same goals .... feel free to take what is in 2.5 right now, > > stabilise it, and add these patches, making your own tree > > probably make a lot of people happy. > > That's the arrogant point of view, you can have, if you get paid for it. Please correct me, but I don't know any major tree from > volunteers. > > I have my own tree integrating XFS, LoopAES, UML, IPVS, Freeswan with X.509, LSM, TUX and some smaller netfilter things. It's not > a big deal integrating these patches, but it's still too much work. Guess, why i am not able to release this to public? > > -- > rainer@ellinger.de > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |