Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:32:00 -0800 | From | george anzinger <> | Subject | Re: low latency & preemtible kernels |
| |
wwp wrote: > > Hi there, > > here's a newbie question: > is it UNadvisable to apply both preempt-kernel-rml and low-latency patches > over a 2.4.18 kernel? > > thanx in advance > > -- I believe that the preempt kernel patch or one related to it does the low-latency stuff in a more economical way, i.e. takes advantage of the preemption code to implement the low-latency stuff. See the lock-break patch that rml has. It should be right next to the preempt patch. -- George george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |