[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: low latency & preemtible kernels
wwp wrote:
> Hi there,
> here's a newbie question:
> is it UNadvisable to apply both preempt-kernel-rml and low-latency patches
> over a 2.4.18 kernel?
> thanx in advance
> --
I believe that the preempt kernel patch or one related to it does the
low-latency stuff in a more economical way, i.e. takes advantage of the
preemption code to implement the low-latency stuff. See the lock-break
patch that rml has. It should be right next to the preempt patch.
Real time sched:
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.060 / U:7.848 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site