lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Martin J. Bligh wrote:

> > Not to begin the flamewar, but no thanks. rmap-12f blows -aa away AFAIK
> > on this P200 w/ 64MB ram.
>
> rmap still sucks on large systems though. I'd love to see rmap
> in the main kernel, but it needs to get the scalability fixed first.
> The main problem seems to be pagemap_lru_lock ... Rik & crew
> know about this problem, but let's give them some time to fix it
> before rmap gets put into mainline ....

This isn't very near on my TODO list though, I've got
the following big items coming up shortly:

rmap 13: O(1) page_launder <- working on it now

rmap 14: pte-highmem support

In addition to this I'm merging some small pieces of code
with both Linus and Marcelo.

Making the locking more scaleable wrt. the pagemap_lru_lock
could be either a simple change or a rework of the way the
VM does locking. I'm not sure which way to go...

regards,

Rik
--
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
-- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.179 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site