Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:00:04 +0000 | From | John Levon <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops |
| |
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:06:48PM -0700, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
> With preemption this turns into a problem that is easier to solve > with a lock or by not having per-cpu caches in the first place --
whilst you're correct (pre-emption has made everything harder), there's not much point moaning about it, since it's in linus' kernel now. So why bother ?
regards john
-- "Oh dear, more knobs." - David Chase - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |