lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops
From
Date
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 18:13, Robert Love wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 17:10, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > ooh. me likee.
> >
> > #define smp_get_cpuid() ({ preempt_disable(); smp_processor_id(); })
> > #define smp_put_cpuid() preempt_enable()
> >
> > Does rml likee?
>
> Yah, that works.

OK, I still likee, but I was just thinking, if we are going to add have
to add something why not consider the irq-safe atomic ops? It is
certainly the most optimal.

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.046 / U:2.960 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site