[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4 bitkeeper repository
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:35:13PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > You forgot about setting the proper BK_USER, BK_HOST and
> > 'bk comment' commands ;)
> heh. Those are rather new things, aren't they? :) Anyhow, the goal for
> these tree(s) is to keep the PPC children trees up to date.

BK_USER, BK_HOST have been around forever but their use is discouraged for
the following reason: BK is a distributed system, we need unique names for
things, and the user&host are part of the name we make up.

bk comments is new and a darned useful thing, too, I'm glad Linus asked
for it. You just have to read the man page and realize that your updates
to the comments may not propogate.
Larry McVoy lm at
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.050 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site