[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Re: crc32 and lib.a (was Re: [PATCH] nbd in 2.5.3 does
Alan Cox <> writes:

> > As a side note, this thing is so tiny (less than 4K on sparc64!) so
> > why don't we just include it unconditionally instead of having all
> > of this "turn it on for these drivers" stuff?
> Because 100 4K drivers suddenly becomes 0.5Mb. There are those of us trying
> to stuff Linux into embedded devices who if anything want more configuration
> options not people taking stuff out.
> What I'd much rather see if this is an issue is:
> bool 'Do you want to customise for a very small system'
> which auto enables all the random small stuff if you say no, and goes
> much deeper into options if you say yes.

I mostly agree. Except when I have looked at trying to get the kernel
(compiled size down) the biggest bloat was in the core. Things like
having both a page and a block cache.

Getting code reuse in the core higher would cut down on kernel size a
lot. But that isn't quick fix territory.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.156 / U:2.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site