[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Disgusted with kbuild developers

Matthias Andree wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>Make the whole thing ___***IDENTICAL***___ to CML1.
>>Do a formal translation of CML1 into CML2.
> This requirement is contrary to CML2's objective. CML2 is not about
> re-implementing CML1 tools and bugs in another language, there are at
> least two current projects for that, one of them is mconfig.

But making the translation in 3 steps make think easier:
- Change the engine (CML2), the rules are rewritten, but
functionally nearly identical to old rules
(Big patch)
- Change the rules (with a lot of small patches)
- Change the interface (not really need)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.032 / U:5.940 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site