[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Page table sharing
On February 18, 2002 08:04 pm, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On February 18, 2002 09:09 am, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > Since copy_page_range would not copy shared page tables, I'm wrong to
> > > point there. But __pte_alloc does copy shared page tables (to unshare
> > > them), and needs them to be stable while it does so: so locking against
> > > swap_out really is required. It also needs locking against read faults,
> > > and they against each other: but there I imagine it's just a matter of
> > > dropping the write arg to __pte_alloc, going back to pte_alloc again.

I'm not sure what you mean here, you're not suggesting we should unshare the
page table on read fault are you?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.135 / U:2.600 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site