[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Page table sharing
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, here it is again.
> Daniel, there's something wrong in the locking.

> Does anybody see any reason why this doesn't work totally without the
> lock?

We'll need protection from the swapout code. It would be
embarassing if the page fault handler would run for one
mm while kswapd was holding the page_table_lock for another

I'm not sure how the page_table_share_lock is supposed
to fix that one, though.


"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
-- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.157 / U:7.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site