[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [TEST] page tables filling non-highmem
On February 18, 2002 02:15 pm, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 01:59:42PM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Could you describe your page table deadlock-avoidance algorithm in more
> > detail please?
> There is nothing specific with the pagetables. If the lowmem was eat by
> skb instead of ptes you'd deadlock the very same way. The kernel will
> just see lots of cache in highmem and of swap available (not to tell the
> kernel never knows how much of such cache is really freeable or how much
> of the mappings are swappable and that's the very next problem that will
> leads to the same deadlock) and it will think there's "freeable" memory
> available and it will keep looping. That's simply plain broken. The
> only way if there's something freeable is to try to free it and if we
> fail we say "oom". You cannot say if there's something freeable by
> checking the cache size or the number of free swap pages, no-way.
> If in 2.5 we want perfect accounting of freeable resources instead, fine
> with me (that would math guarantee to never fail allocations if there's
> at least one page freeable, while right now you only can calculate a
> probabilistic measure), but it has to be _perfect_, and with 2.4 there
> isn't such perfect accounting, so we definitely cannot rely on cache
> size and swap available to know if to trigger oom or not. That's totally
> broken and it will deadlock. I care about those minor theorical things
> too, I want everything calculated and under control, I hate
> approximations that can leads to deadlocks, and it pays off eventually.

You're right, we have to get serious about doing what it takes to have a
precise accounting of pinned memory. What are we going to do, count the
number of 1->2 and 2->1 transitions on page->count? Or should we have a
pin/unpin_page(page) api? Or what?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.070 / U:1.412 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site