[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Disgusted with kbuild developers
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Rob Landley wrote:

> On Saturday 16 February 2002 11:06 am, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Don't tell us that's not doable. Do it and show us that you can do a
> > perfect translation of CML1 into CML2 with all CML1 structural flaws.
> "Hey, the new VM in 2.4.10 should have replicated the swap overload failure
> case in 2.4.9! The first implementation should definitely melt down exactly
> the same way! We need to artificially introduce all the flaws in the old
> one, just to prove it can be done! Otherwise the new code is not
> interesting."


Please read my other mails, understand the nuances, then come back, OK?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.077 / U:2.620 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site