lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Redundant syscalls?
From
Date
Lorenzo Allegrucci <l.allegrucci@tiscalinet.it> writes:

> I was wondering why do we need fsetxattr(2), fgetxattr(2) etc when we
> already have setxattr(2), getxattr(2) etc working on file names
> instead of file descriptors.
> truncate(2)/ftruncate(2) is another more traditional example.

Because you can't reliably derive a file name from an open file
descriptor, so it's useful to have a way to act on the file directly
through the descriptor.

-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.035 / U:24.068 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site