Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:28:08 +0100 | From | Vojtech Pavlik <> | Subject | Re: another IDE cleanup: kill duplicated code |
| |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:50:39PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> Just maybe if the LOT of you would back off you may see > > Uniform Storage Driver. > > Just catch a clue for two seconds and see that I have packetized the > ATA-Command Block IO. Since you have not a clue of why it was done, > please continue with your hair brained ideas.
Maybe we're talking all about the same thing, can you consider that possibility?
> Ever heard of SAS or FPDMA ?
No, sorry, and I checked Google and Google has neither. Perhaps they don't exist (yet)?
> Don't screw with what you do not know about.
I don't see any SAS or FPDMA in the kernel. Thus I'm screwing only with stuff I know about.
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 04:23:03PM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > > > > Anyway, you apparently still missed to kill: > > > > > > int *bs, max_ra; in ide-probe.c > > > > > > as well as: xpram_rahead and friends in s390 code > > > > > > The attached patch is fixing this. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > BTW.> Since there is no longer any difference about the request head > > > handling between IDE and SCSI, what about the idea of moving the whole > > > ide interface stuff under the umbrella of SCSI host adapter? This > > > would be a true cleanup and make the whole ide-scsi and ide-atapi mess > > > go away. IDE is moving fast toward SCSI on the logical level anyway > > > and it would make the hwif macro/lookup crap in the ide code go > > > magically way! At least this generic device handler search stuff > > > should be merged between them (I'm trully tempted to give it a shoot > > > this afternoon.) The only thing it could result in, which would maybe > > > surprise some would be the fact that the major of his root device > > > could just go suddenly away... But hey! What's the heck - we are in > > > odd kernel series anyway ;-). > > > > This is an idea I'm toying with for quite a long time already. And I > > think this is a good idea as well. I have no more time to spend coding > > today, so if you have the afternoon, but I'll definitely find some to > > read the diff if you do this change! > > > > -- > > Vojtech Pavlik > > SuSE Labs > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > > Andre Hedrick > Linux Disk Certification Project Linux ATA Development > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |