[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] sys_sync livelock fix
On February 14, 2002 02:59 am, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:49:03AM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Dangerous advocacy of the broken SuS semantics for sync, has to be stamped
> > out before it spreads ;-)
> Daniel,
> You seem to be taking both sides of this argument.
> Do you agree that sync should be changed to a checkpoint so that doesn't
> block for dirty data created *after* sync was called?

Yes, sorry if I was ambiguous in stating that in any way.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.380 / U:29.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site