Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:38:15 -0700 | From | Richard Gooch <> | Subject | Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t |
| |
David S. Miller writes: > From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:23:50 +0000 (GMT) > > So how do they modify the printf format rules in gcc ? > > Because they can claim that they are part of the C environment, and > for the most part they are right so their extensions go into gcc's > magic list. > > In fact I'd claim their case to be plugging holes in the standards > specified set of printf format strings. :-) > > Hey... we could "borrow" one of these printf format strings we > don't have any need for in the kernel and pretend that is for > "dma_addr_t". :-)
Eeeep! I know you put a smiley there, but don't even think that!
Regards,
Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |