[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [V4L] [PATCH/RFC] videodev.[ch] redesign
> Excellent work. I have no complaints, just a few questions:
> 1. Would it be better to memset the temp buffer in video_generic_ioctl()
> rather than in the driver? I've seen so many drivers forget to do this,
> and it's a potential (albeit very small) security hole.

The wrapper fills the buffer using copy_from_user() -- even for _IOR
ioctls because some are labeled wrong -- and the driver needs that data.
I can't zero the buffer ...

> 2. In skeleton_open(), couldn't the device_data lookup code be replaced
> with:
> struct video_device *vdev = video_devdata(file);
> struct device_data *dev = vdev->priv;

Good point. Yes, that should work.

> 3. In skeleton_initdev(), shouldn't...
> dev->vdev = skeleton_template;
> memcpy(&dev->vdev, &skeleton_template, sizeof(skeleton_template);

No. It does the same.

> 4. Is it safe to keep even 128 bytes on the stack in
> video_generic_ioctl()? Consider that devices might spend a relatively
> long time blocking on VIDIOCSYNC. With 32 devices in use at once, you'd
> be coming dangerously close to a stack overflow.

I don't see a overflow can easily happen here. There is one kernel
strack _per process_. Calling schedule() will also switch the stack.

> IMHO it would be better
> to only allocate as much as MCAPTURE and SYNC need, and fall back on
> kmalloc for the less time-critical ones (if necessary).

struct v4l2_buffer should fit onto the stack too.


#define ENOCLUE 125 /* userland programmer induced race condition */
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.087 / U:21.752 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site