lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] High-res-timers part 1 (core) take 20
    Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    >
    > On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 08:46, george anzinger wrote:
    >
    > > +/*
    > > + * Here is an SMP helping macro...
    > > + */
    > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
    > > +#define IF_SMP(a) a
    > > +#else
    > > +#define IF_SMP(a)
    > > +#endif
    >
    > ehmmmmm personally I would consider any need of this ugly and evil
    >
    > > + IF_SMP(if (old_base && (new_base != old_base))
    > > + spin_unlock(&old_base->lock);
    > > + )
    >
    > Like here..... SMP dependent ifdef's of spinlock usage... shudder
    >
    Well it does seem like a waste to do spinlock ordering code
    on a UP system...
    --
    George Anzinger george@mvista.com
    High-res-timers:
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
    Preemption patch:
    http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.020 / U:149.412 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site