Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:02:56 -0500 (EST) | From | tmrbilldavidsen <> | Subject | [BENCHMARK] ctxbench kernel.org 2.5.50 |
| |
Runs were smp kernel, smp kernel with nospm option, uni kernel. Uni was much faster, smp results varied highly.
I tried more runs and longer runs with the SMP kernel, results (single user mode) still vary a lot.
-- bill davidsen, CTO TMR Associates, Inc <davidsen@tmr.com> Having the feature freeze for Linux 2.5 on Hallow'een is appropriate, since using 2.5 kernels includes a lot of things jumping out of dark corners to scare you.
================================================================ Run information ================================================================
Run: 2.5.50nosmp-bl CPU_MHz 498.049 CPUtype Celeron (Mendocino) HostName bilbo.tmr.com KernelName 2.5.50smp Ncpu 1 Run: 2.5.50smp-bl CPU_MHz 497.898 CPUtype Celeron (Mendocino) HostName bilbo.tmr.com KernelName 2.5.50smp Ncpu 2 Run: 2.5.50uni-bl CPU_MHz 497.953 CPUtype Celeron (Mendocino) HostName bilbo.tmr.com KernelName 2.5.50 Ncpu 1
================================================================ Results by IPC type ================================================================
loops/sec SIGUSR1 low high average 2.5.50nosmp-bl 51675 56403 54818 2.5.50smp-bl 8841 55534 38632 2.5.50uni-bl 66374 66536 66434
loops/sec message queue low high average 2.5.50nosmp-bl 104965 105261 105105 2.5.50smp-bl 46184 104640 71925 2.5.50uni-bl 121383 122357 121851
loops/sec pipes low high average 2.5.50nosmp-bl 81211 81529 81411 2.5.50smp-bl 42573 70910 56900 2.5.50uni-bl 127910 129669 128603
loops/sec semiphore low high average 2.5.50nosmp-bl 110582 112044 111450 2.5.50smp-bl 54085 78742 63654 2.5.50uni-bl 131425 132274 131794
loops/sec spin+yield low high average 2.5.50nosmp-bl 252055 252529 252361 2.5.50smp-bl 244146 344592 279022 2.5.50uni-bl 322742 325100 323594
loops/sec spinlock low high average 2.5.50nosmp-bl 3 3 3 2.5.50smp-bl 1194785 1194882 1194841 2.5.50uni-bl 3 3 3
| |