Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again) | From | "Martin Schwidefsky" <> | Date | Mon, 9 Dec 2002 19:41:41 +0100 |
| |
> You're not looking at a recent 2.5.x tree with the nanosleep() restart > logic. I had been looking at 2.5.50, we had a different meaning of current. If you are saying that for any implementation of nanosleep I have to implement the -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK thingy anyway, then I better start with it.
blue skies, Martin
Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247 E-Mail: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |