[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] generic device DMA implementation
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 11:26:57AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 08:45:30PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > Actually, no, since my idea was to remove the "consistent_alloc()"
> > path from the driver entirely - leaving only the map/sync approach.
> > That gives a result which is correct everywhere (afaict) but (as
> > you've since pointed out) will perform poorly on platforms where the
> > map/sync operations are expensive.
> As I've also pointed out in the past couple of days, doing this will
> mean that you then need to teach the drivers to align structures to
> cache line boundaries. Otherwise, you _will_ get into a situation
> where you _will_ loose data.

Sure, but that's already an issue with the current streaming DMA API.

David Gibson | For every complex problem there is a | solution which is simple, neat and
| wrong.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.052 / U:9.796 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site