lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] generic device DMA implementation
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 11:26:57AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 08:45:30PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > Actually, no, since my idea was to remove the "consistent_alloc()"
> > path from the driver entirely - leaving only the map/sync approach.
> > That gives a result which is correct everywhere (afaict) but (as
> > you've since pointed out) will perform poorly on platforms where the
> > map/sync operations are expensive.
>
> As I've also pointed out in the past couple of days, doing this will
> mean that you then need to teach the drivers to align structures to
> cache line boundaries. Otherwise, you _will_ get into a situation
> where you _will_ loose data.

Sure, but that's already an issue with the current streaming DMA API.

--
David Gibson | For every complex problem there is a
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au | solution which is simple, neat and
| wrong.
http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.053 / U:1.184 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site