[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] generic device DMA implementation
    From said:
    > I like your term DMA_CONSISTENT better than DMA_CONFORMANCE_CONSISTANT
    > . I think the word "conformance" in there does not reduce the time
    > that it takes to figure out what the symbol means. I don't think any
    > other facility will want to use the terms DMA_{,IN}CONSISTENT, so I
    > prefer that we go with the more medium sized symbol.

    I'm not so keen on this. The idea of this parameter is not to tell the
    allocation routine what type of memory you would like, but to tell it what
    type of memory the driver can cope with. I think for the inconsistent case,
    DMA_INCONSISTENT looks like the driver is requiring inconsistent memory, and
    expecting to get it. I'm open to changing the "CONFORMANCE" part, but I'd
    like to name these parameters something that doesn't imply they're requesting
    a type of memory.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.020 / U:46.888 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site