Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:57:02 +0100 | Subject | Re: [ACPI] Re: [2.5.50, ACPI] link error | From | Ducrot Bruno <> |
| |
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:06:18AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > Doesn't that imply your fix is broken to begin with? > > > > > > ACPI/S4 support needs swsusp. ACPI/S3 needs big part of > > > swsusp. Splitting CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP to S3 and S4 part seems like > > > overdesign to me, OTOH if you do the work it is okay with me. > > > > You broke the design. S3 support was developed long before swsusp was in > > the kernel, and completely indpendent of it. It should have remained that > > way. > > > > S3 support is a subset of what is need for S4 support. > > That's not true. acpi_wakeup.S is nasty piece of code, needed for S3 > but not for S4. Big part of driver support is only needed for S3. > > > swsusp is an implementation of S4 support. In theory, there could be > > multiple implementations that all use the same core (saving/restoring > > state). > > There were patches for S4bios floating around, but it never really > worked, IIRC.
No. It work. I do not resubmmited patches because I think that swsusp is better.
-- Ducrot Bruno
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |