[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] generic device DMA implementation
    On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:26:57AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
    > I'm not so keen on this. The idea of this parameter is not to tell the
    > allocation routine what type of memory you would like, but to tell it what
    > type of memory the driver can cope with. I think for the inconsistent case,
    > DMA_INCONSISTENT looks like the driver is requiring inconsistent memory, and
    > expecting to get it.

    Of course if they're flags, then `DMA_CONSISTENT | DMA_INCONSISTENT'
    is pretty obvious...


    P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
    for reasons of military security.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.020 / U:16.244 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site