lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [RFC] generic device DMA implementation
    From
    On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:26:57AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
    > I'm not so keen on this. The idea of this parameter is not to tell the
    > allocation routine what type of memory you would like, but to tell it what
    > type of memory the driver can cope with. I think for the inconsistent case,
    > DMA_INCONSISTENT looks like the driver is requiring inconsistent memory, and
    > expecting to get it.

    Of course if they're flags, then `DMA_CONSISTENT | DMA_INCONSISTENT'
    is pretty obvious...

    -Miles

    --
    P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
    for reasons of military security.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.048 / U:60.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site