[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [2.5.50, ACPI] link error

    > >>>Yes, there are about 10 patches to fix it floating around... I just
    > >>>hope linus takes one of them. (Fix is make ACPI_SLEEP depend on
    > >>>swsusp).
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>I haven't seen the patch, but does it make sense for hardware suspend to
    > >>depend on software suspend?
    > >>
    > >>IMO there should be a common core (CONFIG_SUSPEND?), not force ACPI to
    > >>depend on swsusp. That way you get the _least_ common denominator, not
    > >>the union of two sets.
    > >
    > >
    > >Feel free to fix that, but as swsusp is needed for S4, anyway, I do not
    > >see big need to do that.
    > Why should I fix your fix?
    > Doesn't that imply your fix is broken to begin with?

    ACPI/S4 support needs swsusp. ACPI/S3 needs big part of
    swsusp. Splitting CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP to S3 and S4 part seems like
    overdesign to me, OTOH if you do the work it is okay with me.


    Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building,
    cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.022 / U:4.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site