lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: question on context of kfree_skb()
Oliver Neukum wrote:

>Am Montag, 30. Dezember 2002 23:32 schrieb Manfred Spraul:
>
>
>>Mulix wrote:
>>
>>
>>>dev_kfree_skb_any() should be called when you could be either
>>>executing in interrupt context or not.
>>>
>>>
>>dev_kfree_skb_any() can misdetect the context: You must not use the
>>function if you hold an irq spinlock and you might be running from BH or
>>process context.
>>
>>
>
>What then shall be used under these circumstances ?
>Could you perhaps summarise the issue ?
>
>
When a packet is freed, the upper layers must be notified, for example a
user space process could be waiting for socket buffer space. This can
happen either immediately, or in the next softirq.

dev_kfree_skb_irq() is always ok, although slower than the other
functions. The packet is unconditionally queued and processed later.
dev_kfree_skb_any() tries to optimize it a bit: If it thinks that it's
save to process it now, then the packet is processed immediately. The
autodetection is usually correct, except for the special case I
mentioned. Drivers must work around that.
dev_kfree_skb() always processes the packet immediately. Only permitted
from bottom half context or from process context.

--
Manfred

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.167 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site