[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9

    H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > While we're talking about printk()... is there any reason *not* to
    > rename it printf()?

    kprintf would be better, maybe addind the first argument for verbosity level,
    instead of being "inlined" in the string. But it is a 2.7 change!


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.019 / U:2.792 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site