Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 03 Dec 2002 09:45:53 +0100 | From | Giacomo Catenazzi <> | Subject | Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9 |
| |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > While we're talking about printk()... is there any reason *not* to > rename it printf()?
kprintf would be better, maybe addind the first argument for verbosity level, instead of being "inlined" in the string. But it is a 2.7 change!
ciao giacomo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |