Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Dec 2002 01:09:56 +0100 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4 |
| |
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:09:42PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >>please try with my tree. > > > >It is greatly improved. It is still not as smooth as the standard 2.4 > >scheduler, but I'd characterise it as "a bit jerky" rather than "makes > >me want to punch a hole in the monitor". > > > >The difference is unlikely to be noticed by many. (But it should be > >_better_ than stock 2.4) > > ... > > >>can you reproduce with my tree? > > > >Again, hugely improved over normal O(1) behaviour, but not as responsive > >as the stock 2.4 scheduler. > > Andrea, which patches in your tree are the ones that fix this? > If it's the big-monster one ... any chance you could split out > the bits actually fix it? I'd love to be able to apply your fixes > to 2.5 and try them there ....
it's all in these patches:
andrea@dualathlon:~/remote/kernel.org/kernels/v2.4/2.4.20aa1> ls -1 *sched* 00_flush-inode-reschedule-2 00_sched-O1-aa-2.4.19rc3-5.gz 10_sched-o1-bluetooth-1 10_sched-o1-hyperthreading-3 20_apm-o1-sched-1 20_sched-o1-fixes-8 71_xfs-sched-1
I'm fixing the RT case too right now, in a few days a further fix will be available to avoid deadlocks of some app with RT enabled.
Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |