Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Valgrind meets UML | Date | Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:07:02 -0500 | From | Jeff Dike <> |
| |
jreiser@BitWagon.com said: > In order to prevent races between valgrind for UML and kernel > allocators which valgrind does not "know", then the VALGRIND_* > declarations being added to kernel allocators should allow for > expressing the concept "atomically change state in both allocator and > valgrind".
What are you talking about?
There are no atomicity problems between UML and valgrind.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |