lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Valgrind meets UML
Date
From
jreiser@BitWagon.com said:
> In order to prevent races between valgrind for UML and kernel
> allocators which valgrind does not "know", then the VALGRIND_*
> declarations being added to kernel allocators should allow for
> expressing the concept "atomically change state in both allocator and
> valgrind".

What are you talking about?

There are no atomicity problems between UML and valgrind.

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.161 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site