[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation
    Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> writes:

    |> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 04:17, Andreas Schwab wrote:
    |> > This is useless. Assigning -1 to any unsigned type is garanteed to give
    |> > you all bits one, and with two's complement this also holds for any signed
    |> > type.
    |> Only if the -1 is the same size as the unsigned type. Otherwise it will
    |> be 0-extended.

    Wrong. Unsigned arithmetics is defined as modulo MAX+1, and -1 equals MAX
    modulo MAX+1 for every MAX.


    Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs,
    SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
    Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
    "And now for something completely different."
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.020 / U:109.820 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site