[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> writes:

|> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 04:17, Andreas Schwab wrote:
|> > This is useless. Assigning -1 to any unsigned type is garanteed to give
|> > you all bits one, and with two's complement this also holds for any signed
|> > type.
|> Only if the -1 is the same size as the unsigned type. Otherwise it will
|> be 0-extended.

Wrong. Unsigned arithmetics is defined as modulo MAX+1, and -1 equals MAX
modulo MAX+1 for every MAX.


Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs,
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.103 / U:11.236 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site